Module 7: Equity, Diversity & Inclusion

DEI vs. EDI | Why EDI? | Why EDI? Pt. 2 | Student Affirming Pedagogies | Assignment & Discussion

Why EDI?

Equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) is a more proactive and robust way of addressing the marginalization and oppression in society. You may have encountered versions of the image below that intend to explain the significant difference between equality and equity. Notions of equality tend to ignore obvious and documented limitations different groups historically and currently experience. Equal opportunities are not truly equal since different members of different groups face challenges specific to their multiple identities.

Side-by-side images of three brown-skinned males standing behind a fence while watching a baseball game on a crowded field. They are different heights and stand on top of crates to help see over the fence. The left-side image is titled Equality in bold, capital letters. The right side image is titled Equity in bold capital letters.
“Interaction Institute for Social Change | Artist: Angus Maguire.” and
Many different versions of this image exist, and it’s actually a really interesting example of adapting, adopting and remixing an image, as well as how culturally and geographically nuanced EDI efforts need to be. The original image was created by Craig Froehle in 2013 and featured three white male figures, children looking over a fence as they tried to watch a baseball game in the midwest. In an article explaining his purpose, the meme’s chronology and numerous adaptations Froehle says, “Back in 2012, shortly after the US elections, I had crafted up an image to illustrate my point in an argument I was having with a conservative activist. I was trying to clarify why, to me, ‘equal opportunity’ alone wasn’t a satisfactory goal and that we should somehow take into consideration equality of outcomes.” Since then, the figures have changed colors and genders and been used widely around the world. Additional boxes have been added to include illustrations of “Reality” that depict the tallest and oldest figure on the far left standing on so many crates that only his feet are visible at the top of the image, while the smallest and youngest person is lowered even further into a ditch dug several feet deep. One of the most interesting adaptations addresses “Liberation” and removes the fence completely, while providing a “4thbox” that is blank, waiting to be filled with versions of equity and justice as it relates to this illustration.

This is a handout divided into four even squares. The top left and right, and bottom left include variations of three brown-skinned figures of different heights and ages trying to watch a baseball game. The top left image illustrates equality and top right image illustrates equity as described in the previous image. The bottom left image illustrates "Liberation" and the fence is removed and no crates are required for any of the three figures to see. All three people have their hands raised in some form of excitement. The bottom right square is left blank, titled, "Your Idea Here" in all caps, centered at the base of the square.
Image Credit: A collaboration between Center for Story-based Strategy & Interaction Institute for Social Change.

EDI attempts to redress the intentional and unintentional ways individuals have experienced oppression due to their identities. This can and should occur on a contextual basis and is why a nuanced recognition and understanding of history/ies, how identities and socio-political power functions is critical to make the most equitable choices in any given situation. EDI recognizes that full equity for all might be an impossible reality to achieve and sustain but efforts can always be made to move towards that goal, and that certain groups have been intentionally and historically disadvantaged to benefit others.

Affirmative action is a prime example of attempts to legally enforce equity, though because of the enduring and unshifted dominant structural forces, the policy has been difficult to enforce, dysfunctional, repeatedly attacked and in many ways, effectively dismantled through the recent Supreme Court ruling that removed race as a category to consider during college admissions. EDI ensures that centuries of legalized oppression like structural racism, sexism, and class privilege cannot be ignored.

Over the past few years, critical race theory (CRT) has gotten a terrible rap, and has even been outlawed in certain states. Yet the premise is based in a simple recognition of the historical injustices different racial groups have experienced and the laws used to oppress them in the United States. Laws and policies are clear ways to identify which groups are advantaged or disadvantaged, and a group of law students and scholars in the 1980s became significant contributors to legal theories of racialization, continuing in the long line of advocacy that abolitionists like Frederick Douglass, and the Lyons family; Black feminists like Sojourner Truth, Barbara Smith and the Combahee River Collective; sociologists like W.E.B. Du Bois and Ida B. Wells; and lawyers like Paule Murray and Thurgood Marshall had argued for centuries. Derrick Bell and many others were part of the working group that established critical race theory as a legal field. Kimberlé Crenshaw in particular has been noted for coining the term “intersectionality” though many Black women have been highlighting their multiple identities and the oppression they face as a result of these inseparable and equally significant experiences for centuries. Crenshaw’s case defending Black women at General Motors highlighted the specific discrimination these women faced as they were unable to receive the protections that Black men received (race) or that white women received (gender). There was no policy that addressed their specific experience, but they were being treated differently as, and because they were Black women. 

Intersectionality goes far beyond simply gender and race, and is a lived reality for all people, whether they are forced to confront oppression daily or infrequently, and whether they face oppression for one, a few, many, or all of their identities. 

Though it’s often overlooked and ignored, It’s also important to recognize how oppression and privilege shift from context to context. Even historically marginalized groups can become dominant if they are the majority in a given situation. However, this “flip” in power dynamics does not minimize or erase the historical and/or pervasive social, legal and economic structure. This is why you may have heard controversial statements like, “a Black person cannot be racist.” While the Black person can exhibit extremely prejudiced and even violent behavior towards white or people of other races, this is a largely individual act that does not erase the historical fact and legacy of chattel slavery and anti-Blackness in the United States, much less around the world. It’s important to be able to distinguish between individual and personal acts of oppression/”ism’s” vs. the larger structural forces. However, it’s also important not to minimize the violence and ignorance of a person’s ideology and behavior, as the term racist means to believe one’s own group is superior to others and to dislike or even hate others simply because of their race.

Race is a social construct and not a provable biological or genetic fact, but how has and does our society function? Take a look at the world around you, at who lives and works where, at who is protected and who is penalized, at who is represented politically and where the power resides. Race, just like gender and other identities are social constructs, but they have very real and serious impacts on people’s lives every day, their pasts, and all of our futures.